forum.freeciv.org

cazfi wrote: ↑Fri May 23, 2025 12:19 pm Actually you should already be able to use MinTechs requirements for this effect, though it requires a bit more effort than a dedicated requirement type.

Well, it likely works if the tech tree is guaranteed to have no holes and if you first count all the techs in ruleset.

For me, OSDN today shows 503 all the time. If it is wrong also for you, it is a next bug in a long sequence. Maybe we need to auto-import unclosed issues from there whenever it works?

Looks nice! I'd look at a tileset in this style.

Interesting idea though not one in priority to appear. Currently, it's possible to make a ruleset with different rivers as you can see in Alien World, but they don't connect to each other like big and small rivers normally should. There should be some tweak that we first generate big rivers and then...

Hi! In few words, Freeciv is a remake of CivI/II that is mainly targeted to net multiplayer. As this, it worth trying! In other aspects, its value is often questionable. If you want cool 3d graphics, you are probaly in a wrong place to find them (though in FreecivWeb there were some experiments with...

There are several requests for "Action_Range" effect throughout the forum, probably it will ever appear. For effects, logically, some extension of the multipliers mechanism can be developed, including using like ones some unit or unit type associated counters, but actually just existing re...

Currently, it is not available as a normal game feature; I have tried to work on it but I am currently mostly out of the project. Well, you will need to write in Lua some pathfinder to detect what city is connected to what, there are such algorithms on the web. Then you can place some special extras...

Yes. I too once wanted to make OR reqs but looked into the code and understood it won't work.

nreqs = {"type", "name", "range", "present" "Terrain", "Tundra", "Local", FALSE "Terrain", "Forest", "Local", FALSE } Won't work. On Forest, the 1st nreq fires, on Tundra, the 2nd. To get ORed reqs, ...

It was theoretically NOT possible with nreqs to make an OR-vector sich that you can't achieve an equivalent effect in reqs I don't understand what this sentence means. Also, I'm not sure what exactly <=> means. a OR b OR c is equal to NOT ( NOT a AND NOT b AND NOT c) I mean that you have lost actua...