Can partisans or spies destroy railroads/roads outside of a city?
Posted: Tue Jun 20, 2023 1:17 am
If not, would a ruleset change allow that in 3.0?
WW2 France and Balkans had recorded instances of that.
Likewise, why was General Sherman's March to the Sea 60 miles wide? 'Cause there were two Confederate railroads that distance apart. Of course Sherman's Army would have have been protecting "engineers" that were destroying every piece of iron, heating rails in the center, and bending it around a tree and letting it cool, while still around the tree. Of course Grant and Sherman were very concerned about their supply line from the Ohio river south to Nashville, and on to Chattanooga, as Sherman was marching on Atlanta. That supply line was very vulnerable to raiders as it penetrated the Confederacy. The raiders did attack, but Sherman had very good (hardened) "engineers" that could replace a burned bridge in less than a week.
WW2 France and Balkans had recorded instances of that.
Likewise, why was General Sherman's March to the Sea 60 miles wide? 'Cause there were two Confederate railroads that distance apart. Of course Sherman's Army would have have been protecting "engineers" that were destroying every piece of iron, heating rails in the center, and bending it around a tree and letting it cool, while still around the tree. Of course Grant and Sherman were very concerned about their supply line from the Ohio river south to Nashville, and on to Chattanooga, as Sherman was marching on Atlanta. That supply line was very vulnerable to raiders as it penetrated the Confederacy. The raiders did attack, but Sherman had very good (hardened) "engineers" that could replace a burned bridge in less than a week.