forum.freeciv.org

I think I might got it now. The map grid is kind of off, compared to fog of war, so that some units almost gets invisible. Am I right?

I corrected an error, someone had put a minus-sign in front of the rating (scale goes from 1-10).

It wasn't an error, I put a -5 because I'm opposed to that particular idea. Also, I was absolutely certain that I edited the explanation to contain negatives (the scale should be from -10 to +10 so that you can be *against* someone's idea, but now I realised it's not there. That is an error and now I'm fixing it.)

And maybe I should explain why I'm in favour of the city auto-assigning workers when it grows.

because when it does that, it makes an optimum for all values. Sometimes I may force a city to do on-optimal values because I want to rush something: production or growth. But rushing usually doesn't last forever and this prevents me from keeping this arrangement forever in case I forget it's there.

While someone who wants to keep a non-optimum distribution of workers may keep in mind the reasons for this and reshuffle them once the city grows.

I can see arguments against. I think that the optimal would be a checkbox in each city that lets you decide if workers get auto-assigned on city growth or not. There sure are situations where both would be usefull. Adding this suggestion.

Note: I understand of course that this can be time consuming and/or hard to implement so from a cost/gain benefit the quicker things should have highest priority.

Actually, I'd put a priority to creating the same options/features/interface/possibilities that the Civ Client has before implementing anything new. The client is almost perfect ( can think of a detail or two that it's missing, but nothing serious), and Web is seriously behind. So, smooth out the rough edges first, create new content later.

I have marked the items in the document which have been altered by the update of Freeciv-web today. Some of the items are fixed fully, others are fixed partially. Please help me update the document.

Thank you for the updates!

What kind of help do you need?

Corbeau wrote:Thank you for the updates!

What kind of help do you need?

Just test and verify that I actually fixed the issues, then remove them from the document.

I don't know if this is actually a bug or it's part of the ruleset. All wonders are small wonders under the ruleset and they don't show in the list of "Top 5 Cities".