A WINNING QUIRK

Smallpox vs. largepox, gen2 vs gen5, early war vs. peaceful alliances. Which is your favourite gaming style?
User avatar
Arbogast
Elite
Posts: 412
Joined: Tue Jul 16, 2013 9:09 am
Location: France

Re: A WINNING QUIRK

Post by Arbogast »

Ah Shuks! I abandoned the game in question!
I tried in 2.5 beta and your points holds true.
So I'm trying different games in 2.4 and if I find a repeat of my deleted game, I'll let you know, but that is a slow process.
cazfi
Elite
Posts: 3094
Joined: Tue Jan 29, 2013 6:54 pm

Re: A WINNING QUIRK

Post by cazfi »

While I investigated Pillage case, I found out that I've been mistaken in how this work. Even when reduced movement points, as long as it's not zero, unit can still work on settler activities as if it had full movement.

That is; unit can both move two moves via road (taking 2/3 movement) and to work in the destination with full capacity (despite having only 1/3 movement left).

Code: Select all

int get_activity_rate_this_turn(const struct unit *punit)
{
  /* This logic is also coded in client/goto.c. */
  if (punit->moves_left > 0) {
    return get_activity_rate(punit);
  } else {
    return 0;
  }
}
Post Reply