Page 2 of 2

Re: Transport equivalent for ironclads

Posted: Mon Sep 25, 2017 11:24 pm
by JTN
Re getting graphics for all tilesets, I've created a wiki page to try to track and progress this; see new thread.

Re: Transport equivalent for ironclads

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 10:22 am
by XYZ
I tried myself with a dive bomber (tactical bomber) by using the fighter and make some modifications. Freeciv material?

Re: Transport equivalent for ironclads

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 10:48 am
by XYZ
And maybe somebody can form this into a proper Zeppelin... :D In any case its a beta and actually a picture. Though if you pixel it enough it looks like an amplio unit. The "NAVY" labeling has to be erased if someone wants to continue it...

Re: Transport equivalent for ironclads

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 11:14 am
by XYZ
Another topic: The rudder has for the standard fighter and bomber the colour red. I gave the tactical bomber a green colour since I thought its ground troop support. We could try to introduce a colour nomenclature for the different classes that would also apply for chopters.

For example:

Blue = Transport
Green = Attack aircraft/helicopter
Red = Bomber (strategic)
Yellow = Figther

Re: Transport equivalent for ironclads

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 12:46 pm
by XYZ
Took one of GriffonSpade units and took the arch from another unit, so this crossbower came out...

As well as this anti aircraft gun from the howitzer unit...

Re: Transport equivalent for ironclads

Posted: Wed Sep 27, 2017 2:13 pm
by XYZ
And a better confrontation between interceptor and dive bomber

Re: Transport equivalent for ironclads

Posted: Thu Sep 28, 2017 1:49 pm
by XYZ
WWI bomber

Re: Transport equivalent for ironclads

Posted: Sun Oct 01, 2017 11:52 am
by XYZ
And some chinooks... Too foto-realistic? I can pixel them more