Claws, teeth, eyes, that's all good.
Here's my attempt at my eyes idea.
Art required for freeciv proper (2.5)
Re: Art required for freeciv proper (2.5 & 2.6)
- Attachments
-
- eyes-only.svg
- SVG source
- (4.46 KiB) Downloaded 603 times
- GriffonSpade
- Elite
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:41 pm
Re: Art required for freeciv proper (2.5 & 2.6)
Oh, that /DOES/ look nice, JTN (With the exception of the small shield one, but that's just because it's so small.)JTN wrote:Claws, teeth, eyes, that's all good.
Here's my attempt at my eyes idea.[/attachment]
It certainly conveys the sense that this unit is dangerous, and the white on black standard for barbarians.
Now you just need to make them auto-attack any nearby units and give them partial-invis, lol.
-
- Veteran
- Posts: 53
- Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2014 5:47 pm
Re: Art required for freeciv proper (2.5 & 2.6)
I like JTN's art as well, and would favour it over mine. I like how the shield graphics are suggestive of heads.
Re: Art required for freeciv proper (2.5 & 2.6)
Temple of Artemis with better licensing terms for us: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: ... rtemis.jpg
Mausoleum. Wikimedia licensing lists this as only 70+ years from the author's death, but it's the same author, and made same year, as Temple of Artemis and Statue of Zeus, and the file info states that it's 100+ years: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: ... nassus.jpg
Mausoleum. Wikimedia licensing lists this as only 70+ years from the author's death, but it's the same author, and made same year, as Temple of Artemis and Statue of Zeus, and the file info states that it's 100+ years: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File: ... nassus.jpg
Re: Art required for freeciv proper
This has now been postponed to 3.0pepeto wrote:There will be a need of sprites for goto paths:See patch #5233.
- goto turn number don't have real sprite currently;
- Need also sprites for goto turn number with exhausted moves points;
- Needed graphics for waypoints.
Re: Art required for freeciv proper (2.5 & 2.6)
I found this rather nice picture of the Tomb of Mausolus. Unluckily, I can no longer convert or create graphics. But Someone will take shot at it.
- Attachments
-
- tombofmausolus4.jpg (20.02 KiB) Viewed 26723 times
Re: Art required for freeciv proper (2.5 & 2.6)
Where from? Which kind of licensing it has?Arbogast wrote:I found this rather nice picture of the Tomb of Mausolus.
Re: Art required for freeciv proper (2.5 & 2.6)
It's from "wondersoftheworld.net" and it's copyrighted. Darn. Sorry
- GriffonSpade
- Elite
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Mon Apr 29, 2013 4:41 pm
Re: Art required for freeciv proper (2.5 & 2.6)
Oh! I just realized that while I put them in a2h, I hadn't dropped them here by themselves yet.
Aluminum from amplio iron
Uranium from amplio gold
Saltpeter from amplio coal
Elephant from Architetto Francesco (Public Domain)
Airfield and Airbase from amplio airbase (slightly tweaked both to fit better with the fortress, in case they're used together)
Trench from amplio fortress (others are amplio identical)
Aluminum from amplio iron
Uranium from amplio gold
Saltpeter from amplio coal
Elephant from Architetto Francesco (Public Domain)
Airfield and Airbase from amplio airbase (slightly tweaked both to fit better with the fortress, in case they're used together)
Trench from amplio fortress (others are amplio identical)
Re: Art required for freeciv proper
And now 2.6 is the target release again. Sorry about this going back and forth (it'll come some day anyway, so making the art wouldn't be wasted effort no matter what's the final target release)cazfi wrote:This has now been postponed to 3.0pepeto wrote:There will be a need of sprites for goto paths:See patch #5233.
- goto turn number don't have real sprite currently;
- Need also sprites for goto turn number with exhausted moves points;
- Needed graphics for waypoints.