Question: Fort changes tile ownership

Contribute, display and discuss rulesets and modpacks for use in Freeciv here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Corbeau
Elite
Posts: 1291
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:13 pm

Question: Fort changes tile ownership

Post by Corbeau »

We're playing a game with this:

Code: Select all

[base_fortress]
(...)
border_sq      = -1
Allegedly, this should make fortress NOT claim tile ownership. However, it seems that it does claim it. Any idea what's going on?
--
* Freeciv LongTurn, a community of one-turn-per-day players and developers
* LongTurn Blog - information nexus with stuff and stuff and stuff
* Longturn Discord server; real-time chatting, discussing, quarrelling, trolling, gaslighting...
Dino the Dinosore
Hardened
Posts: 171
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2017 3:41 am

Re: Question: Fort changes tile ownership

Post by Dino the Dinosore »

Could be that the code is treating the value as unsigned, which makes it effectively 255. I heard that something similar was responsible for Ghandi becoming so murderous. Maybe try 0?
Akechi
Posts: 34
Joined: Thu Dec 07, 2017 12:17 pm

Re: Question: Fort changes tile ownership

Post by Akechi »

Corbeau wrote:Allegedly, this should make fortress NOT claim tile ownership. However, it seems that it does claim it. Any idea what's going on?
Is there any other border generating something?
I think other city is in near...
Have you tried middle clicking on the fortress and check who claimed the tile?
Attachments
unclaimed_fortress_in_260.png
User avatar
Corbeau
Elite
Posts: 1291
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 11:13 pm

Re: Question: Fort changes tile ownership

Post by Corbeau »

Thanks, I'll check it.
--
* Freeciv LongTurn, a community of one-turn-per-day players and developers
* LongTurn Blog - information nexus with stuff and stuff and stuff
* Longturn Discord server; real-time chatting, discussing, quarrelling, trolling, gaslighting...
Post Reply