Another game with the new ruleset MP2-Caravel has been launched at freecivweb.org
This one is another BEGINNERS level game.
https://www.freecivweb.org/game/details ... &port=6188
You can find out more by following links to Discord from there.
Search found 127 matches
- Sat Apr 23, 2022 7:40 pm
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Longturn Unrated #22 for Beginners Only
- Replies: 0
- Views: 6893
- Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:04 pm
- Forum: Wishlist
- Topic: things i'd like to be implemented
- Replies: 21
- Views: 7962
Re: things i'd like to be implemented
I'm a little late to notice this. At http://www.freecivweb.org adding a pop unit to a city triggers a CMA re-arrange, similar to if a military unit stepped on a worked tile. I would suggest that the main upstream server versions copy this behaviour. It was very simple and didn't require messing with...
- Sat Mar 19, 2022 7:31 pm
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Longturn Rated Game #38. High-level match
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2971
Longturn Rated Game #38. High-level match
LongTurn Game #38 is up, for experienced players (or players of any level looking for a tough matchup). MP2-Caravel ruleset (see https://freeciv.fandom.com/wiki/Multiplayer_II:_Caravel,_Game_Manual ) About this game: 20 players 77% land, 23% ocean Diplomacy settings > 5% tax on gold transfers > Tech...
- Thu Mar 17, 2022 9:37 pm
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Longturn Unrated Game #21 for BEGINNERS ONLY is now up at freecivweb.org
- Replies: 0
- Views: 2779
Longturn Unrated Game #21 for BEGINNERS ONLY is now up at freecivweb.org
Unrated Game #21 is up, for BEGINNERS ONLY. MP2-Caravel ruleset (see https://freeciv.fandom.com/wiki/Multiplayer_II:_Caravel,_Game_Manual About this game: 22 players FAIR islands (each island is a clone of the others but may be rotated and flipped randomly) 4 starting cities (3 settlers + 1 founder)...
- Thu Mar 17, 2022 9:31 pm
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Freecivweb.org do not respond
- Replies: 1
- Views: 1473
Re: Freecivweb.org do not respond
there was only a provider outage for a few hours
- Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:58 am
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Announcement of an initiative to bring our communities together
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6312
Re: Announcement of an initiative to bring our communities together
Guilty parties talking like angels, it's fine. Bigger projects using crappier corporate pay-to-win and having 50x more people, not so fine. 3.2 server with agnostic client and everyone working on it admitting or not to unification, very fine. Forking your projecting into new licensing that restricts...
- Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:49 am
- Forum: Announcements
- Topic: Release candidate 3.0.0-RC1
- Replies: 2
- Views: 5603
Re: Release candidate 3.0.0-RC1
3.0 is a major big time upgrade, freeciv can't be more proud of the main people who did it.
At first it's just compatible to everything before so it won't seem big, but no, it is big big big.
At first it's just compatible to everything before so it won't seem big, but no, it is big big big.
- Tue Nov 16, 2021 5:32 pm
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
- Replies: 73
- Views: 79507
Re: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
Yeah, I should've just used your stable release. Sorry. Oh wait, it didn't exist. This is a falsehood. Every continued falsehood or half truth you make in public, and especially ones trying to zero-sum me and FCW, are digging a deeper hole for you to never come out of. One day you'll probably regre...
- Tue Nov 16, 2021 3:26 am
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
- Replies: 73
- Views: 79507
Re: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
TL;DR: Canik is not an innocent "poor little amateur" who "just tried to get compliant", but knowingly, deliberately, and wantonly engaged in a campaign to steal code from FCW and try to use that anti-competitively against us WHILE working with agents and affiliates who assisted ...
- Mon Nov 15, 2021 9:41 pm
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
- Replies: 73
- Views: 79507
Re: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
cazfi wrote: For the "jumping conclusions" part FCW should fix their misleading setup. The master branch is currently presented as "The current state of the https://www.freecivweb.org server. " by master branch being the default one that one gets when either entering github page...