Search found 127 matches

by Lexxie
Sat Apr 23, 2022 7:40 pm
Forum: Freeciv-web
Topic: Longturn Unrated #22 for Beginners Only
Replies: 0
Views: 5288

Longturn Unrated #22 for Beginners Only

Another game with the new ruleset MP2-Caravel has been launched at freecivweb.org

This one is another BEGINNERS level game.

https://www.freecivweb.org/game/details ... &port=6188

You can find out more by following links to Discord from there.
by Lexxie
Thu Mar 24, 2022 9:04 pm
Forum: Wishlist
Topic: things i'd like to be implemented
Replies: 21
Views: 7738

Re: things i'd like to be implemented

I'm a little late to notice this. At http://www.freecivweb.org adding a pop unit to a city triggers a CMA re-arrange, similar to if a military unit stepped on a worked tile. I would suggest that the main upstream server versions copy this behaviour. It was very simple and didn't require messing with...
by Lexxie
Sat Mar 19, 2022 7:31 pm
Forum: Freeciv-web
Topic: Longturn Rated Game #38. High-level match
Replies: 0
Views: 2641

Longturn Rated Game #38. High-level match

LongTurn Game #38 is up, for experienced players (or players of any level looking for a tough matchup). MP2-Caravel ruleset (see https://freeciv.fandom.com/wiki/Multiplayer_II:_Caravel,_Game_Manual ) About this game: 20 players 77% land, 23% ocean Diplomacy settings > 5% tax on gold transfers > Tech...
by Lexxie
Thu Mar 17, 2022 9:37 pm
Forum: Freeciv-web
Topic: Longturn Unrated Game #21 for BEGINNERS ONLY is now up at freecivweb.org
Replies: 0
Views: 2537

Longturn Unrated Game #21 for BEGINNERS ONLY is now up at freecivweb.org

Unrated Game #21 is up, for BEGINNERS ONLY. MP2-Caravel ruleset (see https://freeciv.fandom.com/wiki/Multiplayer_II:_Caravel,_Game_Manual About this game: 22 players FAIR islands (each island is a clone of the others but may be rotated and flipped randomly) 4 starting cities (3 settlers + 1 founder)...
by Lexxie
Thu Mar 17, 2022 9:31 pm
Forum: Freeciv-web
Topic: Freecivweb.org do not respond
Replies: 1
Views: 1444

Re: Freecivweb.org do not respond

there was only a provider outage for a few hours
by Lexxie
Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:58 am
Forum: Freeciv-web
Topic: Announcement of an initiative to bring our communities together
Replies: 9
Views: 6248

Re: Announcement of an initiative to bring our communities together

Guilty parties talking like angels, it's fine. Bigger projects using crappier corporate pay-to-win and having 50x more people, not so fine. 3.2 server with agnostic client and everyone working on it admitting or not to unification, very fine. Forking your projecting into new licensing that restricts...
by Lexxie
Sat Feb 05, 2022 8:49 am
Forum: Announcements
Topic: Release candidate 3.0.0-RC1
Replies: 2
Views: 4354

Re: Release candidate 3.0.0-RC1

3.0 is a major big time upgrade, freeciv can't be more proud of the main people who did it.

At first it's just compatible to everything before so it won't seem big, but no, it is big big big.
by Lexxie
Tue Nov 16, 2021 5:32 pm
Forum: Freeciv-web
Topic: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
Replies: 73
Views: 78509

Re: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org

Yeah, I should've just used your stable release. Sorry. Oh wait, it didn't exist. This is a falsehood. Every continued falsehood or half truth you make in public, and especially ones trying to zero-sum me and FCW, are digging a deeper hole for you to never come out of. One day you'll probably regre...
by Lexxie
Tue Nov 16, 2021 3:26 am
Forum: Freeciv-web
Topic: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
Replies: 73
Views: 78509

Re: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org

TL;DR: Canik is not an innocent "poor little amateur" who "just tried to get compliant", but knowingly, deliberately, and wantonly engaged in a campaign to steal code from FCW and try to use that anti-competitively against us WHILE working with agents and affiliates who assisted ...
by Lexxie
Mon Nov 15, 2021 9:41 pm
Forum: Freeciv-web
Topic: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
Replies: 73
Views: 78509

Re: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org

cazfi wrote: For the "jumping conclusions" part FCW should fix their misleading setup. The master branch is currently presented as "The current state of the https://www.freecivweb.org server. " by master branch being the default one that one gets when either entering github page...