Search found 91 matches
- Fri Apr 08, 2022 4:47 pm
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Apology to Lexxie & Truepurple
- Replies: 2
- Views: 2143
Apology to Lexxie & Truepurple
Lexxie isn't Truepurple: A while back I speculated that a new person the community, Truepurple, was a Lexxie multi. Since then it's become quite clear they are not the same person and, understandably, neither appreciate the comparison. While my speculation was genuine and I never unequivocally said...
- Fri Apr 01, 2022 3:42 pm
- Forum: Longturn
- Topic: Freeciv TnT - Game 7: From The Ashes
- Replies: 0
- Views: 10045
Freeciv TnT - Game 7: From The Ashes
As the hatch opens your mood immediately lightens. For a moment all your worries are forgotten as the sweet earthy scent of fresh, natural air, invades your nostrils. You stand in stunned silence until someone grunts and shoulders past you. It was the leader of a rival faction. Many disagreed with h...
- Wed Mar 09, 2022 9:45 am
- Forum: Single player
- Topic: Calvary won't attack enemy city
- Replies: 3
- Views: 7438
Re: Calvary won't attack enemy city
did you try moving your unit onto the enemy tile?
in 2.6 this is how I attack
in 2.6 this is how I attack
- Thu Feb 10, 2022 12:37 am
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Announcement of an initiative to bring our communities together
- Replies: 9
- Views: 6444
Re: Announcement of an initiative to bring our communities together
Lexxie would you please talk on the discourse forum?
- Tue Nov 16, 2021 9:08 pm
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
- Replies: 73
- Views: 81654
Re: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
Yeah, I should've just used your stable release. Sorry. Oh wait, it didn't exist. This is a falsehood. Every continued falsehood or half truth you make in public, and especially ones trying to zero-sum me and FCW, are digging a deeper hole for you to never come out of. One day you'll probably regre...
- Tue Nov 16, 2021 4:44 am
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
- Replies: 73
- Views: 81654
Re: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
TL;DR: Canik is not an innocent "poor little amateur" who "just tried to get compliant", but knowingly, deliberately, and wantonly engaged in a campaign to steal code from FCW and try to use that anti-competitively against us WHILE working with agents and affiliates who assisted...
- Tue Nov 16, 2021 4:33 am
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
- Replies: 73
- Views: 81654
Re: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
TL;DR: Canik is not an innocent "poor little amateur" who "just tried to get compliant", but knowingly, deliberately, and wantonly engaged in a campaign to steal code from FCW and try to use that anti-competitively against us WHILE working with agents and affiliates who assisted...
- Mon Nov 15, 2021 10:03 pm
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
- Replies: 73
- Views: 81654
Re: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
What do you call someone who refuses to just be compliant first AND refuses using proper back channels to get whatever code they actually needed or wanted for something, AND lies in public about "poor us we're amateurs just trying to get compliant" I was a poor amateur just trying to get ...
- Mon Nov 01, 2021 3:27 am
- Forum: Art and tilesets
- Topic: Art required for freeciv proper (3.1)
- Replies: 5
- Views: 11535
Re: Art required for freeciv proper (3.1)
cazfi wrote:Thanks. That should resolve amplio & amplio2 part of it. Waiting art for other tilesets (especially hexemplio that is the default tileset)
- Fri Oct 29, 2021 9:56 pm
- Forum: Freeciv-web
- Topic: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
- Replies: 73
- Views: 81654
Re: Source code for Freeciv-web running on Freecivweb.org
I do applaud this show of concern for community relations by FCW. Along with some other attempts at community unification by FCW staff. Fuzzy in particular but to the others involved as well. I hope we can build on it. For clarification, can you specify the "others" bit? I know about Fuzz...